НАЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ НАУК АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА
ОТ ПРЕДСТАВИТЕЛЬНОЙ ДЕМОКРАТИИ К ПРЯМОЙ ДЕМОКРАТИИ И МЕРИТОКРАТИИ: КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВЗГЛЯДЫ НА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ОБЩЕСТВОМ
Алгулиев Расим М., Юсифов Фархад Ф.

В статье исследуется переход от представительной демократии к прямой демократии и концепция формирования электронной демократии. Меритократия рассматривается как один из механизмов управления государством, и основные дискуссии направляются на защиту основных человеческих ценностей и формирование демократического общества. Определены перспективы в направлении развития концептуальных подходов к управлению обществом и механизмы электронной демократии. (стр. 41-49)

Ключевые слова:государственное управление, электронное государство, электронная демократия, прямая демократия, меритократия.
Литература
  • McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964, 318 p.
  • Wahid F. The Current State of Research on eGovernment in Developing Countries: A Literature Review, In H. Scholl, M. Janssen, M. Wimmer, C. Moe & L. Flak (Eds.), Electronic Government, Springer, 2012, vol. 7443, pp. 1-12.
  • Zhang H., Xu X., Xiao J. Diffusion of e-government: A literature review and directions for future directions // Government Information Quarterly, 2014, vol. 31, no.4, pp. 63-636
  • Fang I. A History of Mass Communication Six Information Revolutions, Focal Press, 1997, 320 p.
  • Robertson D.S. The Information Revolution // Communication Research, 1990, vol. 17, no.2, pp. 235-254
  • Drucker P.F. Management Challenges for the 21st Century, Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Classic Collection, 1999, 224 p.
  • Rahman Sh., Rashid N., Yadlapalli A., Yiqun L. Determining factors of e-government implementation: a multi-criteria decision–making approach / Proceedings of PACIS 2014 Chengdu, China, 24-28 June, 2014, pp. 73-85.
  • Chen Y. C., Knepper R. Digital Government Development Strategies. Lessons for Policy Makers from a Comparative Perspective, In Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation. Idea Group publishing, 2005, 464 p.
  • Ozkan S., Kanat E.I. e-Government adoption model based on theory of planned behavior: Empirical validation // Government Information Quarterly, 2011, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 503-513
  • Shareef M.A., Kumar V., Kumar U., Dwivedi Y.K. e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels // Government Information Quarterly, 2011, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17-35
  • Bwalya K.J., Plessis T. Du and Rensleigh C. E-government implementation in Zambia – prospects // Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2014, vol. 8, no.1, pp. 101-130
  • Alshehri , Drew S. E-government principles: implementation, advantages and challenges // Intnational Journal Electronic Business, 2011, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 255-270
  • Siskos E., Askounis D., Psarras J. Multicriteria decision support for global e-government evaluation // Omega, 2014, vol. 46, pp. 51–63.
  • Schedler K., Scharf M.C. Exploring The Interrelations Between Electronic Government And the New Public Management - A Managerial Framework For Electronic Government / Workshop on Developing a Basic Research Program for Digital Government at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, 2002, pp. 1-14.
  • Schedler K., Schmidt B. Managing the e-government organization // International Public Management Review, 2004, pp. 1-20.
  • Wimmer M. Knowledge Management in Electronic Government. Springer-Verlag, 2003
  • Meier A. eDemocracy & eGovernment, Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, 226 p.
  • Williams R.W. Democracy, Cyberspace, and the Body, 2006, http://clogic.eserver.org/2006/williams.html
  • Carrizales T. Critical Factors in an Electronic Democracy: a Study of Municipal Managers // The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2008, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23-30
  • Anttiroiko A.-V. Building Strong E-Democracy - The Role of Technology in Developing Democracy for the Information Age // Communications of the ACM, 2003, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 121-128
  • Becker T. Teledemocracy: Bringing Power Back to the People // The Futurist, 1981, pp. 6-9
  • Becker T. Teledemocracy, Section: E-Democracy, Category: Introduction to E-Democracy // Information Resources Management Association, 2007, pp. 1519-1520, www.irma-international.org/viewtitle/11706/
  • Grossman L.K. The Electronic Republic. Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age. N.Y.: Viking (20th Century Fund), 1995, 290 p.
  • Fountain J. Building the Virtual State. Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington: Brooking Institution Press., 2001, 256 p.
  • Habermas The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press, 1991, 301 p.
  • Rheingold H. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1993, 447 p.
  • Kaczmarczyk A. Cyberdemocracy as a Future Product of Political Systems Engineering // Frontiers in Science, 2011, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5-15.
  • Bimber B. The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism // Polity, 1998, vol. 31, no 1, pp. 133-160.
  • Hill K.A., Hughes J.E. Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc., Oxford, 1998, 224 p.
  • Hilbert M. The Maturing Concept of E-Democracy: From E-Voting and Online Consultations to Democratic Value Out of Jumbled Online Chatter // Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2009, vol. 6, pp. 87–110.
  • Young M. The rise of the meritocracy, 1870-2033: An essay on education and inequality, Thames & Hudson, London, 1958, 160 p.
  • Bell D. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 259 p.
  • Bell D. On meritocracy and equality, National Affairs. Public Interest, 1972, vol. 29, pp. 29-68.
  • Daniels N. Merit and meritocracy, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1978, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 206-223.
  • Azərbaycan Respublikasında informasiya cəmiyyətinin inkişafına dair 2014-2020-ci illər üçün Milli Strategiya, 4 aprel 2014-cü il, http://president.az/articles/11312