AZERBAIJAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
DIGITALIZATION OF LAW COMMUNICATION IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY
Andrey V. Skorobogatov

The article examines the digitalization of law communication as the most important feature of the development of the law reality of the information society. On the basis of the discursive-communicative methodology, the communicative nature of virtual reality and the role of law means in ensuring conflict-free interaction of its subjects are analyzed. It is concluded that the manifestation of digitalization of law reality is the construction of cyber law, which simultaneously acts as a form of virtual law discourse and an institution of digital law. Cyber law is a set of rules conventionally formed in the process of law communication that regulate relations between two or more persons regarding virtual property and personal non-property benefits. The construction of cyber law is carried out in the process of law communication and is a conventional result of interaction that ensures conflict-free coexistence of virtual communities based on value orientations. The polyphonic nature of virtual law communication determines that cyber law is a fragmented set of relatively independent normative arrays of separate virtual communities that have only minimally common features that can be designated as the principles of cyber law (anonymity, conventionality, inviolability of private property, publicity) (pp.35-41).

Keywords:Cyber law, Digitalization, Information society, Law communication, Law discourse, Virtual reality, Law reality, Conventionality of law, Social law, Individual law
DOI : 10.25045/jpis.v13.i1.05
References
  • Poster, M. (1990). The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • Danilyan, O.G., Beak, O.P. (2020) Transformations of values in the information society: multidimensionality and diversity. Bulletin of the Yaroslav the Wise National Law University. Philosophy, philosophy of law, political science, sociology series (in Ukrainian) 3 (46), 29-30.
    https://doi.org/10.21564/2075-7190.46.213224
  • O'Barr W.M. (1982). Linguistic evidence: Language, Power and Strategy in the Courtroom (Studies on Law and Social Control) NY, Academic.
  • Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The Language of the Law. Boston, Little, Brown and Co.
  • Habermas, Jű. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston, Beacon Press, Vol. 1-2.
  • Van Hoecke, M. (2002). Law as Communication. Oxford, Hart Publishing.
  • Alexy, R. (1994) Begriff und Geltung des Rechts. 2th Aufl. Freiburg (i.B.)/München, Karl Alber.
  • Perelman, Ch. (2012). Ethique et Droit. Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
  • Dubrovskaya, T.V. (2017). Metapragmatics of Administering Justice in Russian and English Judicial Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 1(21), 73-90.
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-73-90
  • Konovalova, M.V. (2014). Evocative category of coherence as an example of legal discourse: monograph. Chelyabinsk, Encyclopedia (in Russian)
  • Krapivkina, O.A. (2016). Judicial Dissents: Legal and Linguistic Aspects. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(10), 2449-2459.
    https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-2016-9-10-2449-2459
  • Palashevskaya, I.V., Leontiev, V.V., Kurchenkova, E.A., Stepanova, E.D., Bulanov, D.S. (2017) Correlations of Status Positions of Courtroom Discourse Participants. Xlinguae, 3(10), 45-56.
    https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2017.10.03.04
  • Antonov, M., Polyakov, A., Chestnov, I. (2014). Communicative Approach and Legal Theory. Rechtstheorie, 45(1), 1-18.
    https://doi.org/10.3790/rth.45.1.1
  • Khramtsova, N.G. (2012). Discourse-legal analysis: from theory to application practice. Monograph. Kurgan, publishing house of the Kurgan State University (in Russian).
  • Chestnov, I.L., Samokhina, E.G. (2020). The Principle of Relativityin the Post-Classical Theory of Law. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(13), 42-49.
    https://doi.org/10.17516 / 1997-1370-0540
  • Giltrow, J., Stein, D. (eds.). (2017). The Pragmatic Turn in Law: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse. Berlin/Boston, De Gruyter Mouton, XI.
  • Pashentsev, D.A., Zaloilo, M.V. (ed.) (2019). Transformation of legal reality in the digital era: collection of scientific papers. Moscow, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, INFRA-M (in Russian).
  • Habermas, J. (2004). The Theory of Communicative Action. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • Polyakov, A.V. (2014). Communicative legal understanding: Selected works. St. Petersburg, Alef-Press (in Russian).
  • Chestnov, I.L. (2012). Postclassical theory of law: monograph. St. Petersburg, Alef-Press (in Russian).
  • Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analisys of Natural Language. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Each age has its own networks (in Russian)
    https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=116691
  • Lipschultz, J.H. (2015). Social media communication: concepts, practices, data, law and ethics. NY, Routledge.
  • Skorobogatov, A.V., Krasnov, A.V. (2016). Legal space: postclassical interpretation. Russian Journal of Legal Studies, 3(8), 81-88. (in Russian)
  • Lahlou, S. (2008). Identity, Social Status, Privacy and Face-Keeping in Digital Society. Social Sciences Information, 47, 3(47), 299-330.
    https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS18163
  • Kondratieva, L.M. (2012). Private and public in virtual reality. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University named after V.N. Karazin. Theory of culture and philosophy of science Series, 1029(1/47). (in Russian)
    https://periodicals.karazin.ua/thcphs/article/view/1932
  • Chueva, E.N., Moskolenko, D.V. (2020). Features of personal identification with online game characters. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2(113), 112-120. (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.20323/1813-145X-2020-2-113-112-120
  • Dimitrov, N.G. (2018). Pseudonyms on the Internet as a Personal Presentation Tool. SocioTime, 2(14), (pp.75-81). (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.15350/2410-0773.2018.2.75
  • Skorobogatov, A.V., Krasnov, A.V. (2018). Individual law as the basis of the legal behavior of an individual. Russian Journal of Legal Studies. 1(5), 81-90. (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS18352
  • Savinskaya, O.B., Shotashvili, V.A. (2013). Influence of online game passion on the intensity of communication and social skills of players. Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes. 6(117), 123-135. (in Russian)
  • Chernyaeva, K.O. (2010). Cultural identification in social networks of the Internet. Bulletin of the Povolzhsky Institute of Management, 1(22), 209-214. (in Russian)
  • Koneva, A.V. (2018). “Digital identity”: processes of identification and representation in network communication. Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin, 1, 50-60. (in Russian)
  • Kondakov, A.M., Kostyleva, A.A. (2019). Digital identity, digital self-identification, digital profile: problem statement. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Informatization of Education Series, 3(16), 207-218. (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8631-2019-16-3-207-218
  • Habermas, Y. (1995). Democracy. Intelligence. Morality: Moscow lectures and interviews. Moscow, JSC “Kami”, Publishing Center «Academia».(in Russian)
  • Molchanova, M.M., Lekova, P.A. (2021) Crisis of verbal content in the Internet discourse. Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series 2: Philology and Art History, 2(277), 224-228. (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.53598/2410-3489-2021-2-277-224-228
  • Schellewald, A. (2021). Communicative Forms on TikTok: Perspectives From Digital Ethnography. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 15, 1437-1457.
    https://doi.org/1932–8036/20210005
  • Huizinga, Y. (2004). Homo ludens. In the Shadow of Tomorrow / trln. from the Dutch by V. Oshis. Moscow, AST. (in Russian)
  • Sheldon, P., Rauschnabel, Ph.A., Honeycutt, J.M. (2019). The Dark Side of Social Media: Psychological, Managerial, and Societal Perspectives. London, Academic Press.
  • Kulikova, O.M., Suvorova, S.D. (2021). The role of chatbots in effective communication building. International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences, 4-3(55), 33-37. (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2021-4-3-33-37
  • Skorobogatov, A.V. (2021). Digital law: in search of balance between reality and virtuality. The vector of development of management approaches in the digital economy: Proceedings of the 3rd All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Kazan, January 28, 2021. Kazan, Poznanie, 2021, (pp.410-415). (in Russian)
  • Gurvich, G.D. (2004). The idea of social law. Gurvich G.D. Philosophy and Sociology of Law: Selected Works/Translated by M.V. Antonov, L.V. Voronina. St. Petersburg, Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, Publishing House of the Faculty of Law of St. Petersburg State University, (pp. 41-212). (in Russian)
  • Alekseeva, K.S. (2019). Anonymity and its influence on the self-presentation of a person in virtual reality. Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy, 5(61), 32-35. (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2019.5.5
  • Talapina, E.V. (2019). Human rights on the Internet. Journal of Russian Law, 2, 41-54. (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2019_2_4
  • Ladosha, O.M. (2019). Communicative imperatives in German-speaking social networks. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice. Tambov, Gramota, 5(12), 597-303. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.5.63
  • Trufanova, E.O. (2021). Private and Public in the Digital Space: Blurring the Boundaries. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 1, 14-38. (in Russian)
    https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i1.130